Tuesday 20 August 2013

The Boredom Rooms in Japanese Companies- New Management Trend!


The Boredom Rooms in Japanese Companies- New Management Trend!

I read an article on the internet,  which said in Sony Corporation in Japan, Boredom rooms or Chase out rooms have come up to lay off employee indirectly as the labor legislation in Japan supports job security, unlike American companies where the norm is Hire and Fire policy.  Below is the link about the Boredom room a new trend  in Sony, NEC and other companies as per the article.


After reading the above article, as a HR practitioner was really startled and disturbed to know that the management can even think such way’s to lay off resources?  

In some Indian companies prior to recession, to lay off someone who is not performing or toeing the line of management was to change the reporting structure internally or bring someone above the employee. Thus not providing an internal growth so that employee feels ashamed and looks for opportunities outside the department/location within the company or leaves the company on his/her own accord.

During the recession, the companies in India and other western countries have been ruthlessly  laying off resources- Lehman brothers is a great example of 2008 recession and the company was in existence for more than 100+ years http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehman_Brothers.  Now the question is what is ethical practice- whether laying of resources due to recession or separation due to non-performance is right as is done in US which is the norm in India too last many years or consider Japanese culture where it is practiced as “Life time employment and be hypocritical by retrenching an employee through a boredom/chase out rooms.

In my opinion that there is no stigma attached today, unlike earlier times and a practical way to handle the recession or non-performance is through a separation.  The best way to do this exercise should be through a Human touch, empathy and sensitivity. 

It is always better that  the reporting manager/management/ HR talks to the identified employees so as to make them realize that their continuity is a challenge in the organization as the company will not be able to do justice to them. The growth, opportunity through a career progression or support them monetarily through increments/revisions- because of their non performance or due to the economic scenario, is not possible.  The pain is the same whether you put them in Chase out rooms or hire and fire policy.  The best way is to speak to the employees directly with sensitivity, it builds confidence.  If need be, speak to Union’s where Union exists, instead of alienating the employee in boredom rooms and making them suffocate. “The saddest thing is when you are feeling low & down; you look around to realize that there is no shoulder for you”. This is the pain and trauma one goes through during loneliness.

The management has to have a dialogue as part of separation so that management’s point of view is put forward and employee’s concerns are addressed- it is a two way process to provide a win-win solution. Employees appreciate the straight talk, they will have respect for the management / Leadership style and the core values of the organization.  The message should come out clearly that the decision is out of compulsion and market scenario and definitely not personal- It is a business decision.  There is hope for the employee to return, when the market opens or they upgrade their skills. Such professional approach is mutually beneficial to employee as well as management.

In my opinion the Sony Corporation need not have created the Boredom/Chase out rooms and keep the reluctant employee in the system.  If the decision is on sympathy or legislation, they can very well pay the salary as part of settlement or pay them through a negotiation while they are at home, so that a negative behavioral impact in the system can be avoided.  Retaining an employee in boredom room and playing with their psych is not a healthy Management/HR trend.

While balancing between the management and employees as a people strategist, HR has some moral commitments to the profession. Managing resource rationalization is an (he) art and has to be done with due respect, which I will share my experience as a HR Leader in subsequent posts.

Monday 19 August 2013

Hard work to Success is a Myth!!

Many leaders have written and spoken about success.  One of the famous quotes is: 1% Inspiration and 99% Perspiration.   I beg to differ on this quote and it is purely my point of view which may not be in sync with those who have achieved or defined success.

In my opinion, Success is 1% Inspiration, 98% Perspiration and 1% other factors!!!  What are the other factors?  It can be Luck, risk, coincidence, Destiny, opportunism, time, Core values, support, acceptance etc…

Let me give few examples just as to assimilate that Success need not be 1% of Inspiration and 98% hard work but other important factors really makes a difference to the Success story.

On the political circles, let us take L K Advani, who has 40 plus years as a parliamentarian and successful political leader and has built a party from scratch which is 98% perspiration.  Definitely he has 1% inspiration to become the PM, but he has been left with no choice today with a tag as “Aspiring Prime Minister”.  In his case I can say confidently, his destiny or time or luck is not clicking.  Another example is our current Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who has had two successful terms.  Did he have perspiration, of course yes, as a successful economist and finance minister, a great bureaucrat but did he have 1% of Inspiration to become the PM of India, of course ‘NO”, not even in his wildest dream, but the other factor 1% which I am mentioning on his part is sheer luck and opportunism of others around him which makes him continue as a prime minister.  On Narendra Modi today, he has that 99% but the one 1% factor which I am mentioning in his case is “acceptability”- can that happen!

Let us take another example: The success of Vijay Malaya and King Fisher is well known, but is he able to sustain that success due to his perspiration even though he has 1% inspiration to be a flamboyant business man, no then what is lacking that 1% other factor which I am mentioning- May be core values were missing in his case or say Satyam Raju’s case. How many would like to emulate TATA’s success or Infosys Success.  In Infosys case they made history and NRN is a great visionary, but do we think only 1% and 98% helped the company- In my point of view that other 1% factor is, the team coming together.  Reliance for instance was born out of manipulation of License Raj- that is history which is the other factor as per my point of view.

How many would like to emulate the success story of D-Gang or Hitler, do we call that success even though it may have all filmy ingredient of 1% and 98%- what is that missing?? In my opinion again the core values?
We always have role models from rags to riches story- for example Rajnikanth from entertainment industry.  Do we think only 99% of the factors helped him- a big “NO’- the other 1% factor in my point of view is the right connect with right people- say K. Balanchandar, was his turning point and there after no looking back. It is the same with other success stories!!

Do we think Nethaji’s contribution or Sardar Patel’s contribution to Indian freedom struggle was lesser than those who ruled the nation for eg. Nehru and family- Of course NO, but what is that other factor which missed them to put them in ruling pedestal was – Opportunism by others.

Why a great mathematician Ramanujam, got recognition very late in his life or others like him- were they lacking anything- Definitely yes, the TIME  was not with him!

Those who are born in a successful family are not always successful and those who are born in not so well bred families are not always a failure.

In my opinion, recognition does not lead to success but success leads to recognition. Sustaining success is always a challenge.  I believe in that 1% differentiating factor which is my point of view, which you need to wait- until then the laws of karma and Dharma has to be continued.

If you agree, please share your experience and if you disagree, still you can share your comments!